<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lucky Dragon &#187; automotive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luckydragon.net/tag/automotive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luckydragon.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10 Tanks of Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.luckydragon.net/2009/02/10-tanks-of-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckydragon.net/2009/02/10-tanks-of-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckydragon.net/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I finished the 10th tank of gas in my new Fit. The EPA mileage estimates for a 2009 Honda Fit Sport with manual transmission are 27 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. Here are my mile per gallon stats: 33.91 mpg (317.0 miles, 9.349 gallons) 33.13 mpg (310.4 miles, 9.368 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I finished the 10th tank of gas in my new Fit. The EPA mileage estimates for a <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/honda/fit/2009/index.html">2009 Honda Fit Sport</a> with manual transmission are 27 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. Here are my mile per gallon stats:</p>
<ol>
<li>33.91 mpg (317.0 miles, 9.349 gallons)</li>
<li>33.13 mpg (310.4 miles, 9.368 gallons)</li>
<li>33.84 mpg (337.7 miles, 9.979 gallons)</li>
<li>34.93 mpg (339.6 miles, 9.723 gallons)</li>
<li>35.13 mpg (341.9 miles, 9.737 gallons)</li>
<li>35.93 mpg (330.0 miles, 9.185 gallons)</li>
<li>35.02 mpg (327.0 miles, 9.337 gallons)</li>
<li>33.71 mpg (277.3 miles, 8.225 gallons)</li>
<li>36.98 mpg (346.8 miles, 9.377 gallons)</li>
<li>35.68 mpg (357.0 miles, 10.005 gallons)</li>
</ol>
<p>That gives me an overall average of about 35 mpg. Not bad! The car is totally stock, and I am primarily driving in stop and go traffic on the way to and from work. I try to start slowly, shift around 2500 rpm, and coast down hills. Also, I have not needed to use the air conditioning very much. The biggest factor, however, is the realtime and per-trip mpg displays on my dashboard.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing quite like instant feedback. If I zoom up a hill, my realtime readout gets into the low teens and the per-trip display may drop a tenth of a point or more. Conversely, when I set the cruise control to 60 mph on a flat stretch of highway, I see the realtime mpg go above 40 mpg and the per-trip meter starts ticking upwards. I have to wonder what would happen if these displays were required in all cars. In fact, if you own a car made after 1996, you could add such a display right now by purchasing a widget that plugs into your cars <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-Board_Diagnostics">OBD II</a> connector. Although I have not used it, the <a href="http://www.scangauge.com/">ScanGauge II</a> has been recommended by several people over at <a href="http://www.cleanmpg.com/">cleanmpg.com</a> and <a href="http://www.fitfreak.net/forums/eco-fit/">fitfreak.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckydragon.net/2009/02/10-tanks-of-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

